Rechercher dans ce blog

Friday, March 31, 2023

Opinion | A Biden Bait-and-Switch on Electric Vehicles - The Wall Street Journal

Resume Subscription

We are delighted that you'd like to resume your subscription.

You will be charged $ + tax (if applicable) for The Wall Street Journal. You may change your billing preferences at any time in the Customer Center or call Customer Service. You will be notified in advance of any changes in rate or terms. You may cancel your subscription at anytime by calling Customer Service.

Please click confirm to resume now.

Adblock test (Why?)


Opinion | A Biden Bait-and-Switch on Electric Vehicles - The Wall Street Journal
Read More

ChatGPT data leak has Italian lawmakers scrambling to regulate data collection - Ars Technica

ChatGPT data leak has Italian lawmakers scrambling to regulate data collection

Today an Italian regulator, the Guarantor for the Protection of Personal Data (referred to by its Italian acronym, GPDP), announced a temporary ban on ChatGPT in Italy. The ban is effective immediately and will remain in place while the regulator investigates its concerns that OpenAI—the developer of ChatGPT—is unlawfully collecting Italian Internet users’ personal data to train the conversational AI software and has no age verification system in place to prevent kids from accessing the tool.

The Italian ban comes after a ChatGPT data breach on March 20, exposing “user conversations and information relating to the payment of subscribers to the paid service,” GPDP said in its press release. OpenAI notified users impacted by the breach and said it was "committed to protecting our users’ privacy and keeping their data safe," apologizing for falling "short of that commitment, and of our users’ expectations."

Ars could not immediately reach OpenAI to comment. The company has 20 days to respond with proposed measures that could address GPDP’s concerns or face fines of up to 20 million euro or 4 percent of OpenAI’s gross revenue.

Potential mitigation efforts to lift the ban could include notifying users about how OpenAI collects their data and implementing an age verification system to stop young kids from using ChatGPT.

GPDP is also concerned that ChatGPT’s answers to text prompts can manipulate data and potentially mislead users by inaccurately processing data and ultimately sharing misinformation.

Currently, GPDP said there is no legal basis for OpenAI to collect and store personal data to train its AI model, which ChatGPT uses to simulate and process convincingly real conversations. There is also no age verification system to prevent minors from being exposed to answers to text prompts that are “absolutely unsuitable” to younger users’ “degree of development and self-awareness.”

Ars could not immediately reach GPDP to comment on the next steps in its investigation.

Because OpenAI is not currently based in the European Union, the company has up to 60 days to appeal the ban, according to a GPDP document.

Should governments be restricting AI tools?

ChatGPT is just one of many AI tools spurring a lively ethics debate, with some critics urging regulators to slow down AI technology development until the risks of mass adoption are fully understood. However, according to Reuters, ChatGPT is the fastest-growing consumer application in history—reaching 100 monthly active users within a couple of months of its launch—which is likely why it has become one of the first popular AI tools to face a government ban.

The heightened scrutiny of OpenAI’s products in particular has seemingly just begun. Earlier this week, a nonprofit AI research group submitted a complaint to the US Federal Trade Commission about OpenAI’s product GPT-4, claiming it was “biased, deceptive,” and poses “a risk to privacy and public safety.” GPT-4 is trained on a massive amount of online data and is already available to ChatGPT Plus subscribers and powers Microsoft’s Bing.

Adblock test (Why?)


ChatGPT data leak has Italian lawmakers scrambling to regulate data collection - Ars Technica
Read More

EV tax credit eligibility to be reduced in the coming month - Fox Business

Eligibility for key tax credits could be reduced or lost altogether for a number of electric vehicles in the coming month.

When April 18 arrives, EVs will be subject to new rules that impose critical mineral and battery component sourcing requirements that could cause their eligibility for a clean vehicle tax credit to be lost. The Department of the Treasury unveiled the notice of proposed rulemaking on the matter Friday. 

The proposed new guidance, the Treasury Department said, is meant to "lower costs for consumers, build a resilient industrial base and spur manufacturing in the U.S." as well as "strengthen supply chains with like-minded partners that are vital for energy security."

The U.S. Treasury Department building

The U.S. Treasury Department building in Washington, D.C. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The starting percentage of value of battery components required to be made or assembled in North America will come in at 50% for 2023, reaching 100% in 2029 after having been upped each year in the interim, the proposed rule said. 

FORD INVESTING IN $4.5B INDONESIAN NICKEL PLANT TO SUPPLY KENTUCKY-BUILT BATTERIES

Under the proposed guidance on critical minerals, 40% of the value of them in the battery "must be extracted or processed in the United States or a country with which the United States has a free trade agreement, or be recycled in North America," for this year, according to the Treasury Department. The required percentage will see incremental increases of 10% each year until it becomes 80% in 2027.

If a newly-purchased EV meets the proposed mineral and battery component requirements, it can get the $7,500 credit, according to the Treasury Department. If it only meets one of them, the EV will have it for the $3,750 one.

Tesla dealership

A Tesla Model X vehicle is taken for a test drive at a Tesla electric car dealership in Sydney, Australia, May 31, 2017. (Reuters/Jason Reed / Reuters Photos)

During a call ahead of the announcement Friday, a Biden administration official told reporters that it was unclear how many vehicles would actually be eligible for the tax credit under its proposed rules, Fox News Digital reported.

Which EVs will have eligibility is "not a question that can be answered today," Alliance for Automotive Innovation CEO John Bozzella wrote in a Friday blog post, noting the manufacturers give the information directly to the Internal Revenue Service. 

"This latest turn will further reduce the number of eligible EVs," he said. "Fewer vehicles (and fewer customers) will qualify for the full $7,500 credit in the near term."

Bozzella also suggested that for the $7,500 credit under the new rules, "few of the 91 models currently for sale" would be eligible. Some, he said, will "certainly qualify for a partial credit."

A notice visible Friday on the top of Tesla’s website said the $7,500 tax credit "is anticipated to be reduced for Model 3" starting April 18. 

DEMOCRAT MANCHIN THREATENS TO SUE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION OVER ELECTRICAL VEHICLE TAX CREDITS: REPORT

Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin slammed the Treasury Department’s guidance in a statement, arguing that it "completely ignores" the Inflation Reduction Act’s intent.

There is also a provision banning EVs from having battery components produced by a "foreign entity of concern" come 2024, and critical minerals from such entities as of 2025, if they want the tax credit eligibility, according to the Treasury Department. The agency said it "will issue subsequent guidance." 

EV charging station

A line of electric cars and newly installed charging stations sit in front of the Portland General Electric headquarters building on July 28, 2015, in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File) ( (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File) / AP Newsroom)

"It is horrific that the Administration continues to ignore the purpose of the law, which is to bring manufacturing back to America and ensure we have reliable and secure supply chains," he said. "American tax dollars should not be used to support manufacturing jobs overseas. It is a pathetic excuse to spend more tax dollars as quickly as possible and further cedes control to the Chinese Communist Party in the process."

FORD CEO REVEALS EV REALITY: AMERICA ‘CANNOT CONTINUE TO IMPORT’ BATTERIES, EARTH MINERALS

The Inflation Reduction Act – the legislation from which the rules and others pertaining to things like North American final assembly stem – became law over seven months ago with President Joe Biden’s signature.

On a U.S. government-run website, a list of vehicles that currently have eligibility for a credit is publicly available. It will update the information when the new proposed rules, which are subject to a public comment period, go into effect.

Fox News Digital’s Thomas Catenacci contributed to this report.

Adblock test (Why?)


EV tax credit eligibility to be reduced in the coming month - Fox Business
Read More

Thursday, March 30, 2023

Biden Administration Proposes Tougher Bank Rules - Bloomberg Television

Adblock test (Why?)


Biden Administration Proposes Tougher Bank Rules - Bloomberg Television
Read More

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

FDIC Faces $23 Billion in Costs From Bank Failures. It Wants Big Lenders to Pay - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. FDIC Faces $23 Billion in Costs From Bank Failures. It Wants Big Lenders to Pay  Bloomberg
  2. These accounts offer FDIC insurance for deposits greater than $250,000  CNBC
  3. FDIC considering pressing U.S. big banks in paying for bank failure (NYSE:JPM)  Seeking Alpha
  4. Silicon Valley Bank: Insurance for All Bank Deposits Is Manageable  Bloomberg
  5. View Full Coverage on Google News

FDIC Faces $23 Billion in Costs From Bank Failures. It Wants Big Lenders to Pay - Bloomberg
Read More

Stock futures are little changed as investors come off winning day: Live updates - CNBC

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on February 27, 2023 in New York City.

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

Stock futures were little changed Wednesday night.

Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 14 points, trading near flat. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq-100 futures were also near their flatlines.

The moves come amid a hectic week for stocks. The three major indexes ended Wednesday higher, with the Nasdaq Composite leading the way with a roughly 1.8% jump. The S&P 500 and Dow followed at 1.4% and 1% higher, respectively. Those gains mark a reversal from Tuesday, when all three indexes ended the session lower.

Big Tech stocks contributed to Wednesday's advance. Amazon popped 3%, while Meta and Netflix each gained more than 2%. Regional banks, closely followed since Silicon Valley Bank's collapse earlier this month, also finished the session higher, with the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) adding around 1%.

The moves over the course of the week stem from Wall Street's attempts to weigh varying factors, said Thomas Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments. Those factors, he said, include the latest batch of corporate earnings, the future path of interest rates and potential for a recession and, as of recent weeks, the state of the banks.

"There's always been the natural seesaw, but it's sort of never been like this," he said. "There's just so many things that are on investors' minds."

On Thursday, investors will watch for economic data on weekly jobless claims and the gross domestic product. Boston Federal Reserve President Susan Collins, Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari are all slated to speak in the afternoon.

Adblock test (Why?)


Stock futures are little changed as investors come off winning day: Live updates - CNBC
Read More

Micron Sales Forecast Spurs Hope That Worst of Slump Is Over - Yahoo Finance

(Bloomberg) -- Micron Technology Inc., the largest US maker of memory chips, gave a better forecast for the current quarter than some analysts had feared, sparking hope that the worst of a brutal industry slump may be over.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Sales will be as much as $3.9 billion in the fiscal third quarter, the company said in a statement Tuesday. That compares with an average of analysts’ estimates of $3.75 billion. The company also announced an increase in job cuts.

“Customer inventories are getting better, and we expect gradual improvements to the industry’s supply-demand balance,” Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Mehrotra said in the statement. The company delivered earnings for the second quarter that were in line with its projections “in a challenging market environment,” he said.

The forecast suggests the memory chip market may be poised for a comeback after a rough stretch. Over the past year, a steep drop in consumer demand spurred Micron’s customers to slash orders. Instead of buying new chips, they’ve been working through a pileup of excess inventory — a type of scenario that has long plagued the memory industry following boom years.

Micron’s shares rose about 1% in extended trading following the announcement. The stock had gained 19% this year on the hope that the worst of the industry’s downturn was over, closing at $59.28 in regular New York trading.

The company is projecting a loss of about $1.58 a share in the current period, which includes a 45-cent impact associated with $500 million in inventory writedowns. Analysts had estimated a loss of 84 cents a share.

Makers of phones and computers are dealing with weak consumer spending triggered by rising inflation. Micron’s chips, which store and help handle information in such devices, are particularly vulnerable to swings in demand because products from rival companies are directly interchangeable and are traded like commodities.

Rapid fluctuations in the balance between supply and demand can leave producers selling the components for less than they cost to make. Even though Micron shipped more computer memory chips last quarter, revenue still shrank because prices fell about 20%.

Three months ago, Micron announced cost-cutting measures, including a 10% workforce reduction and a slowdown in investment in new production. While the revenue picture will improve in the second half of the year, profitability will remain difficult, it had said.

The Boise, Idaho-based company said Tuesday that its total headcount reduction will now equal 15%. Micron is reducing its spending on new plants and equipment by 40% to $7 billion this year, according to presentation slides posted on its website.

For 2023, the company expects that demand will grow faster than supply. Micron projects a transition to sequential revenue growth, saying that inventory has peaked and end markets such as smartphones and personal computers are contracting less severely than feared. Micron’s data center unit bottomed in the second fiscal quarter, it said.

Mehrotra has argued that the company would deliver more stable earnings than in past downturns. The industry now has a small number of competitors — and they’re more focused on profits than gaining market share — potentially making the field more resilient. Memory chips also have a wider range of uses than in the past.

But that thesis came undone due to a unique set of circumstances: the war in Ukraine, a surge in inflation, Covid disruptions and other supply-chain woes.

Micron competes with South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. and SK Hynix Inc. SK — which, like Micron, is focused mostly on memory — has also suffered losses, causing it to curb expansion plans. Samsung, meanwhile, has a more diversified business. It’s the world’s largest smartphone maker and has other sizable divisions, allowing it to remain profitable and have the cash to invest.

The pace at which profitability recovers will be determined by whether the company’s peers follow its lead and reduce production to the point that supply will be below last year’s level, Mehrotra said in an interview. Other companies have taken actions to varying degrees, he said.

“The recovery could be accelerated if further supply cuts are made,” he said.

In the three months ended March 2, Micron’s revenue declined 53% to $3.69 billion. The company had a loss of $1.91 a share, excluding certain items. That compares with an average estimate of a loss of 63 cents a share and sales of $3.75 billion.

Showing the impact of a collapse in orders, the company is on course to lose more than $3 billion in 2023, its worst annual deficit since it first went public in 1984.

(Updates after-hours trading in fifth paragraph and CEO comments in 15th paragraph.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)


Micron Sales Forecast Spurs Hope That Worst of Slump Is Over - Yahoo Finance
Read More

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Bitcoin Seesaws Around $27K as Investors Digest Binance-CFTC Lawsuit - CoinDesk

“Bitcoin is displaying such unbelievable resilience to what is happening around it, even in the crypto industry, that you have to wonder just how sustainable that can be,” Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at foreign exchange market maker Oanda, wrote in a Tuesday note. He added that the CFTC-Binance-triggered price drop “doesn't feel particularly significant.”

Adblock test (Why?)


Bitcoin Seesaws Around $27K as Investors Digest Binance-CFTC Lawsuit - CoinDesk
Read More

Apple Pay Later turns Apple into a full-on money lender - Ars Technica

With the limited launch today of a new service called Apple Pay Later, Apple will now lend money directly to users through the Wallet app on devices like the iPhone.

We first  heard about the service in 2021, and it was officially announced at the company's Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2022. It faced several delays, though, as iOS 16 began to roll out last September.

Now Apple is "inviting select users to access a prerelease version of Apple Pay Later." The service will roll out to everyone "in the coming months."

Those who can use it now can apply for loans ranging in amount from $50 to $1,000—but they'll only be able to spend the lent money with merchants (online or otherwise) that accept Apple Pay.

The loan payoffs will be split into four payments, and users will have six weeks to pay the loans off with no interest. The payments need to be made with a debit card, Apple says.

When users initiate the loan, Apple performs a soft credit check before making an offer. A screen appears on the user's device that outlines the payment plan. Additionally, there is a screen within the Wallet app wherein users can track their loan balance and future payments on a calendar.

Apple Pay Later builds on Apple's existing relationship with Mastercard and Goldman Sachs; the service is "enabled through the Mastercard Installments program," which Apple says allows the service to work immediately with merchants that already accept Apple Pay. "Goldman Sachs is the issuer of the Mastercard payment credential used to complete Apple Pay Later purchases," Apple says.

That said, Apple formed a subsidiary to finance Apple Pay Later loans—something it didn't do with Apple Card or Apple Pay before. The subsidiary will start reporting loans to US credit bureaus this fall.

As smartphone adoption has slowed down somewhat recently, Apple has spent several years branching beyond profits based on hardware sales, diversifying within a wide range of services like streaming entertainment, cloud backups, fitness, and financial productions.

Listing image by Apple

Adblock test (Why?)


Apple Pay Later turns Apple into a full-on money lender - Ars Technica
Read More

Monday, March 27, 2023

Disney Layoffs Hit TV Production, Acquisitions Departments - Hollywood Reporter

Layoffs have begun in Disney’s television divisions.

Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that Monday’s layoffs focused production and acquisitions. Among the notable staffers let go Monday are Jayne Bieber, senior vp production at Freeform/Onyx Collective; Mark Levenstein, head of production and postproduction at Hulu; and Elizabeth Newman, head of Disney’s acquisitions department.

Sources note Newman’s entire acquisitions team has been dissolved, while Bieber and Levenstein’s production teams will be folded under Carol Turner, exec vp production at ABC Signature. That team will continue to report to Eric Schrier, whom Dana Walden promoted late last year to president of Disney Television Studios and business operations at Disney General Entertainment.

Related Stories

Details on the size of Monday’s layoffs or what percentage of Disney’s workforce were impacted were not immediately available as additional TV side layoffs are expected to come by week’s end, with the largest round coming in April.  

As Disney CEO Bob Iger warned Monday, layoffs would be starting this week as part of a round of cuts that would eliminate a total of 7,000 staffers. In February, Iger said that Disney will trim 7,000 jobs as part of a streamlined restructuring that will focus on three divisions: Disney Entertainment, ESPN and Parks, Experiences and Products. The cuts, he said, are “necessary for creating a more effective, coordinated and streamlined approach to our business,” Iger wrote in an internal memo Monday, adding that senior leaders have been evaluating their operational needs since he announced the cuts. The third and final round of layoffs are expected to come before the start of the summer, Iger said.

The staff cuts are part of a larger plan to create $5.5 billion in cost savings at the company and come as other conglomerates are similarly reducing their workforce in a bid to streamline staff and right-size their ranks as a recession looms.

Monday’s moves eliminate siloed production divisions and consolidate that department into one unit covering all of the TV side while also eliminating a separate acquisitions unit.

Iger returned to the CEO role in a stunning move in November after Disney’s board ousted his previous replacement, Bob Chapek, after only two and a half years in the role. Iger’s first action item since returning to the Mouse House was to oust Chapek’s top lieutenant, Kareem Daniel. As part of Chapek’s Disney restructuring, he tapped Daniel to lead the newly created the Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution division. The unit frustrated creative executives as Daniel had control of all of Disney’s non-parks revenue as he controlled the purse strings on spending for TV and film.

After pushing out Daniel, Iger folded DMED and restructured to give financial oversight back to creatives and tapped Walden and Alan Bergman to oversee Disney Entertainment, with Jimmy Pitaro continuing to lead ESPN, and Josh D’Amaro running the parks and products division.

For her part, Bieber had been with Disney since 2009, starting as a producer at Disney Channel before rising through the ranks at ABC in the production and operations department. She served as VP of the department for more than a decade and earned her senior vp stripes in 2018 when she added Freeform to her purview.

Levenstein, meanwhile, had been with Hulu as head of production and postproduction since mid-2019.

Newman moved from the TV lit and media rights side at CAA to vp development at Disney in late 2019. She was named head of creative acquisitions in early 2021 when former Disney studio chief Craig Hunegs formed the creative acquisitions department that now reports to former FX brass Schrier.

Adblock test (Why?)


Disney Layoffs Hit TV Production, Acquisitions Departments - Hollywood Reporter
Read More

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Gordon E. Moore, 1929-2023 - WSJ - The Wall Street Journal

Resume Subscription

We are delighted that you'd like to resume your subscription.

You will be charged $ + tax (if applicable) for The Wall Street Journal. You may change your billing preferences at any time in the Customer Center or call Customer Service. You will be notified in advance of any changes in rate or terms. You may cancel your subscription at anytime by calling Customer Service.

Please click confirm to resume now.

Adblock test (Why?)


Gordon E. Moore, 1929-2023 - WSJ - The Wall Street Journal
Read More

Silicon Valley Loses a Giant - TheStreet

Silicon Valley is in mourning. 

The bastion of American tech has just lost one of its founders. 

Gordon Moore, co-founder of semiconductor giant Intel, died on March 24.

"Intel and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation announced today that company co-founder Gordon Moore has passed away at the age of 94," a statement read.

The foundation he established with his wife Betty in 2000 reported that Moore died peacefully, surrounded by family at his home in Hawaii. The Moore foundation donated more than $5.1 billion to charitable causes since it was founded.

A doctor of chemistry, Moore and his longtime colleague, physicist Robert Noyce, nicknamed the "mayor of Silicon Valley", created NM Electronics in 1968. A few months later, the two men bought the Intel name for $15,000.

Moore initially served as Executive Vice President of the company until 1975, when he became President. In 1979, Moore was named chairman of the board and chief executive officer. He remained CEO for almost 10 years. In 1987, he gave up the CEO position and continued as chairman. In 1997, Moore became chairman emeritus, stepping down in 2006.

Moore's Law Significance

In 1971, Intel  (INTC) - Get Free Report marketed the first microprocessor, the equivalent of a computer on a chip, a programmable processor that contained several thousand transistors, a revolution. The Intel microprocessor, the most important piece of a computer, powered about 80% of the world's personal computers. 

Intel has, however, somewhat ceded the ground to semiconductor groups like Samsung and TSMC, whose revenues are higher. Moore will be remembered for developing what is known as Moore's Law.

In 1965, while employed by Fairchild Semiconductor, Moore predicted, in an article published by Electronics magazine, that the density of transistors on integrated circuit would double every year.

He would revise his projection in 1975, in an equally empirical way, to the density doubling every two years. Another microchip pioneer, Carver Mead, called this prophecy Moore's Law.

The evolution of microprocessor capabilities has followed Moore's Law for decades, increasing the performance of electronics and computing while driving down costs.

According to several estimates, the cost of a transistor has been reduced by several hundred million times since the beginning of the 1960s. This evolution has made it possible to revolutionize computing and electronics, first with personal computers, then with various devices, up to the mobile phone.

Specialists predict that Moore's law will soon no longer apply due to physical limits of the integration of transistors on a circuit.

Gordon Moore Tributes

Tributes to Moore started pouring in as soon as his death was announced.

"The world lost a giant in Gordon Moore, who was one of Silicon Valley’s founding fathers and a true visionary who helped pave the way for the technological revolution. All of us who followed owe him a debt of gratitude," wrote on Twitter Apple's CEO Tim Cook. "May he rest in peace."

Pat Gelsinger, the Intel CEO, said that Moore "defined the technology industry through his insight and vision."

"He was instrumental in revealing the power of transistors, and inspired technologists and entrepreneurs across the decades. We at Intel remain inspired by Moore’s Law and intend to pursue it until the periodic table is exhausted," Gelsinger continued.

Adblock test (Why?)


Silicon Valley Loses a Giant - TheStreet
Read More

3.4K Pounds Of Beef Chuck Product Recalled Due To Possible E. Coli Contamination - Daily Voice

Thousands of pounds of a beef chuck product are being recalled due to possible E. coli contamination.

Approximately 3,436 pounds of various weights of boneless items labeled "Elkhorn Valley Pride Angus Beef 61226 BEEF CHUCK 2PC BNLS" were packed on Thursday, Feb. 16,  the US Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced on Friday, March 24.

View the product label here.

The complete list of serial numbers and box count numbers can be found here.

The product subject to recall bears the establishment number “EST. M-19549” inside the USDA mark of inspection. 

These items were shipped to distributors, federal establishments, retail locations, and wholesale locations, which include hotels, restaurants, and institutions, in New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, and Michigan.

The problem was discovered when FSIS was conducting routine FSIS testing of ground beef derived from this product and the sample confirmed positive for E. coli. There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to the consumption of these products.

Most people infected with E. coli develop diarrhea (often bloody) and vomiting, FSIS said. 

Distributors and other customers who have purchased these products for further processing should not use them or further distribute them. The products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

Consumers with food safety questions can call the toll-free USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 888-MPHotline (888-674-6854) or live chat via Ask USDA from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. (Eastern Time) Monday through Friday. 

Consumers can also browse food safety messages at Ask USDA or send a question via email to MPHotline@usda.gov. 

to follow Daily Voice Suffolk and receive free news updates.

Adblock test (Why?)


3.4K Pounds Of Beef Chuck Product Recalled Due To Possible E. Coli Contamination - Daily Voice
Read More

Saturday, March 25, 2023

Elon Musk gives Twitter employees details on ‘very significant’ stock awards after relentless layoffs, cost-cutting: Report - Fortune

Twitter employees might have left the office Friday feeling particularly demoralized. Last month, after yet another round of layoffs, CEO Elon Musk indicated he’d share information about “very significant stock and other compensation awards, based on performance” on March 24. 

Employees received no such information by the end of the workday. “People are not happy, to say the least,” tweeted Platformer journalist Zoë Schiffer, who tracks the company closely. 

But late last night, Musk apparently sent an email to employees with some of the much-anticipated details. Schiffer and the Wall Street Journal reported they obtained the message. 

Fortune reached out to Twitter for comments but received no immediate reply, at least not from any humans. (The company no longer has a media communications team.)

In the email, Musk acknowledged the radical changes at Twitter since his $44 billion takeover in October, but said they were needed because the company had been close to running out of money, according to Schiffer. Now, financial incentives for workers should align with the company, which will do periodic liquidity events, he reportedly wrote.

Twitter is offering employees new equity grants that will start to vest after six months, according to the Journal, and in about a year it will offer a liquidity event in which they can cash out some of that equity.

The new grants will vest over four years, according to the Journal, and will be separate from legacy equity converted to cash when Musk took over.

Musk took Twitter private after buying it. In its last full year as a public firm, it had more than 7,500 employees and spent nearly $630 million on stock-based compensation, according to the Journal. As of December, the company had about 2,000 workers, following one round of layoffs after another and drastic cost-cutting measures

Earlier this week, Musk sent employees an email at 2:30 a.m. saying the “office is not optional,” complaining about the San Francisco office being half empty. Musk has been a fierce critic of remote work, suggesting remote employees only “pretend to work.”

Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today.

Adblock test (Why?)


Elon Musk gives Twitter employees details on ‘very significant’ stock awards after relentless layoffs, cost-cutting: Report - Fortune
Read More

Germany and E.U. Agree to Exception in Planned Ban on Combustion Engines - The New York Times

Berlin has been pushing to allow the sale of vehicles running on synthetic fuels past 2035. Its dispute with the E.U. threatened the bloc’s climate goals.

The German government has reached an agreement with the European Union to allow the sale of vehicles that burn fuels made from renewable energy past 2035, resolving a dispute that threatened to upset a key element of the bloc’s path to climate neutrality.

Volker Wissing, Germany’s minister for transportation, said on Saturday that Berlin had won assurances from negotiators that the rules for new vehicles would be technology neutral, allowing carbon-neutral synthetic fuels, known as e-fuels, to be used. Germany had been pushing for an exception to the E.U.’s proposed 2035 ban on internal combustion engines.

“This paves the way for vehicles with combustion engines that only use CO2-neutral fuels to be newly registered after 2035,” Mr. Volker Wissing said.

“In a first step, a vehicle category of e-fuels-only is to be created and subsequently integrated into the fleet limit regulation,” he said. The full process is to be completed by the fall of 2024, he said.

Berlin’s decision in early March to seek a change in the E.U. legislation came on the eve of a final vote, causing a rift among E.U. governments and threatening to undermine legislation that is a cornerstone of the European Union’s ambitious plans to make the 27-member bloc carbon-neutral by 2050.

Germany’s position was supported by some carmakers, including Porsche, but it has provoked criticism from other manufacturers that have begun spending huge sums to shift their production toward electric vehicles in anticipation of the ban.

The vote can now be held on Tuesday when energy ministers meet in Brussels. Several other countries, including Italy and the Czech Republic, that had opposed the legislation will be unable to reach a sufficient number of votes to block its passage. Italy wanted further assurances, including how cars using biofuels could also be exempted.

“We will work now on getting the CO2-standards for cars regulation adopted as soon as possible, and the Commission will follow-up swiftly with the necessary legal steps,” Frans Timmermans, the vice president of the European Commission who oversees the bloc’s push toward climate neutrality, said on Twitter.

Adblock test (Why?)


Germany and E.U. Agree to Exception in Planned Ban on Combustion Engines - The New York Times
Read More

Cathie Wood Slams Hindenburg For Its 'Wildly Misleading' Short Report on Block, As Ark Steps Up Purchase Of Jack Dorsey-Led Company Stock - Block (NYSE:SQ), ARK Innovation ETF (ARCA:ARKK) - Benzinga

Block, Inc. SQ fell over 16% in two sessions after Hindenburg released a short report on the Jack Dorsey-run payment processing company, and one high-profile CEO isn't too happy.

What Happened: Sharing a Twitter thread from Ark analyst Maximilian Friedrich on Saturday, Ark Invest founder Cathie Wood said Hindenburg seems to believe that investors and analysts with deep expertise in fintech won’t read its reports.

The short seller appears to think that speculators and traders will support its short positions by selling without reading or understanding the reports, she added.

“Wildly misleading,” Wood said.

In his tweet, Friedrich noted that while Hindenburg claimed that Cash App was the only electronic P2P payment processor mentioned in a COVID-19 fraud indictment, the research firm did not say that the defrauded funds had come via Bank of America Corp. BAC, which which had "sent the criminal $1.26 million in PUA [Pandemic Unemployment Assistance] benefits."

The vast majority of the funds obtained via BofA were cashed out using ATMs, bank branches and BofA credit cards. Money transfers or funds transfer services including Cash App accounted for only 7% of the total or about 12% of the cashed-out funds, Freidrich added.

Read Also: Best Fintech Stock

While Cash App, like many financial services companies, was likely used for fraud during the COVID pandemic, its spending limits may have prevented "the criminal" from cashing out even more of the funds, Friedrich said.

The analyst noted that companies have a risk engine, which they continuously perfect and tune up or down. “Some fintech co's might have temporarily tuned them down to provide a lifeline to many struggling individuals and businesses ignored by banks during COVID,” he added.

Ark Backs Block To Hilt: Ark lapped up Block shares amid its slump following the short report's publication. After a sale of about 26,000 Block shares on Jan. 30, Ark did not transact in the stock until March 13 when the banking crisis escalated.

The firm has been a buyer of Block shares since then —  it holds the stock in three of its ETFs - Ark Innovation ETF ARKK, Ark Next Generation Internet ETF ARKW and Ark Fintech ETF ARKF
After the release of the short report, Ark bought a total of 636,543 shares in two sessions. On Friday alone, it bought 263,562 shares valued at roughly $16 million.

Block closed Friday's session down 1.94% at $60.68.
Read Next: Benzinga Bulls And Bears: Nvidia, Tesla, Block And A Massive Vulnerability Found In Dogecoin's Code

Adblock test (Why?)


Cathie Wood Slams Hindenburg For Its 'Wildly Misleading' Short Report on Block, As Ark Steps Up Purchase Of Jack Dorsey-Led Company Stock - Block (NYSE:SQ), ARK Innovation ETF (ARCA:ARKK) - Benzinga
Read More

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

A tick-tock of the US banking crisis - Fox Business

The Federal Reserve’s strategy to cool stubborn inflationary pressures has not only elevated interest rates, it has also created a crisis in the financial sector as bank loans diminish.

Already in 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank have failed, erasing billions of market value in financial stocks, while First Republic Bank struggles to stay in business even after a $30 billion lifeline from other financial institutions.

YELLEN SAYS US WILL TAKE MORE ACTION TO PROTECT SMALLER BANKS IF NEEDED

Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo said they will each contribute $5 billion to First Republic; Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley said they will deposit about $2.5 billion each, while Truist, PNC, U.S. Bancorp, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon hand over about $1 billion, respectively. 

In an interview with FOX Business, Eric Schiffer, CEO of the Patriarch Organization in Los Angeles, said, "The Fed has a face-off against both inflation and a fight to prevent a banking crash from hell."

Customers outside Silicon Valley Bank

A person from Silicon Valley Bank talks to people waiting outside the bank's entrance in Santa Clara, California, on Friday, March 10, 2023. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu / AP Newsroom)

"And this guarantees recession because bank loans are drying up like the desert, and the beast of inflation won't return to its cage," he continued. "Add in lower future earnings not yet revealed, and it sets up dangerous market pain and spontaneous combustion of stocks lower than anyone wants."

FED OFFICIALS MEET IN SHADOW OF BANKING CRISIS, HIGH INFLATION

"Even with interest rate cuts, historical data shows the market takes a hit when inflation is still at play," Schiffer added.

Banking crisis rundown

The month began with investors pulling $40 billion out of Silicon Valley Bank, and on March 10, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) said it seized control of SVB while confirming the lender was shut down by California regulators.

On March 12, the FDIC shut down Signature Bank after regulators said keeping the bank open could threaten the stability of the entire financial system. 

Both banks had a very high ratio of uninsured deposits to fund their businesses.

People walking into a bank

A woman leaves a branch of Signature Bank in New York, Mar. 13, 2023. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig / AP Newsroom)

By March 15, global inflation and the subsequent banking crisis was impacting institutions around the world. Swiss authorities announced a backstop to Credit Suisse after shares for the bank plummeted 30%. Five days later, the Bank of Switzerland took over Credit Suisse despite receiving a $54 billion financial lifeline from the Swiss National Bank to bolster its liquidity.

UBS REACHES AGREEMENT TO BUY CREDIT SUISSE AFTER UPPING OFFER

On March 16, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon began working together on a plan to help the banking sector. On the same day, First Republic Bank received $30 billion in deposits from 11 of the largest U.S. banks as customers raced to withdraw deposits. 

Schiffer said, "The only way to strengthen the banking sector while the Fed manages inflation is to create more short-term stop gaps to prevent future runs on the banks."

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon

Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, during a Bloomberg Television interview on March 6, 2023. (Marco Bello/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

"The Fed's current solution has worked but requires more depth to strengthen the banking sector sustainably," he went on. "The Fed will soon capitulate on interest rates, or they will do severe economic destruction, but the byproduct of inflation will not die."

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Adblock test (Why?)


A tick-tock of the US banking crisis - Fox Business
Read More

SEC sues celebrities including Lindsay Lohan for endorsing cryptocurrencies - The Guardian

The Securities and Exchange Commission have filed charges against a handful of celebrities including Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul and Ne-Yo for violating laws in touting cryptocurrencies.

On Wednesday, the SEC filed the charges against the celebrities as part of its broader charges filed against crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun and three of his companies: Tron Foundation Limited, BitTorrent Foundation Ltd., and Rainberry Inc (formerly BitTorrent) for the unregistered offer and sale of crypto asset securities Tronix (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT).

The SEC charged eight celebrities, which also included rappers Soulja Boy and Lil Yachty, singers Austin Mahone and Akon, and adult film star Kendra Lust for “illegally touting TRX and/or BTT without disclosing that they were compensated for doing so and the amount of their compensation”.

According to the SEC, Sun and his companies offered and sold the crypto asset securities as investments through various unregistered “bounty programs”, which directed “interested parties to promote the tokens on social media, join and recruit others to Tron-affiliated Telegram and Discord channels, and create BitTorrent accounts in exchange for TRX and BTT distributions”.

“This case demonstrates again the high risk investors face when crypto asset securities are offered and sold without proper disclosure,” the SEC chair, Gary Gensler, said in a statement.

All mentioned celebrities except for Soulja Boy and Austin Mahone agreed to pay a total of over $400,000 in disgorgement, interest and penalties to settle the charges, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings.

Adblock test (Why?)


SEC sues celebrities including Lindsay Lohan for endorsing cryptocurrencies - The Guardian
Read More

Moderna CEO brazenly defends 400% COVID shot price hike, downplays NIH’s role - Ars Technica

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on March 22 in Washington, DC.
Enlarge / Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on March 22 in Washington, DC.
Getty | Chip Somodevilla

In Congressional testimony Wednesday, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel unabashedly defended the company's plans to raise the US list price of its COVID-19 vaccines by more than 400 percent—despite creating the vaccine in partnership with the National Institutes of Health, receiving $1.7 billion in federal grant money for clinical development, and making roughly $36 billion from worldwide sales.

Bancel appeared this morning before the Senate's Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee, chaired by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has long railed at the pharmaceutical price gouging in the US and pushed from policy reforms. After thanking Bancel for agreeing to testify, Sanders didn't pull any punches. He accused Moderna of "profiteering" and sharing in the "unprecedented level of corporate greed" seen in the pharmaceutical industry generally.

Sanders contrasted a recent survey finding that 37 percent of Americans can't afford their prescription drugs to the billions of dollars in profits reaped by drug companies. He noted several times that Bancel became a billionaire overnight amid the pandemic. Bancel is now estimated to be worth over $4 billion, Sanders added.

Discount

But mainly, Sanders aimed to convince Bancel to reconsider quadrupling the price of the company's life-saving vaccine, which costs about $3 per dose to make. Amid the pandemic, the federal government spent around $10 billion procuring doses that were freely provided to Americans. Early doses were priced between $15 to $16, while the government paid a little over $26 for the updated booster shots. When federal supplies run out later this year and the vaccines move to the commercial market, Moderna will set the list price of its vaccine at $130.

"This vaccine would not exist without NIH's partnership and expertise, and the substantial investment of the taxpayers of this country," Sanders summarized. "And here is the thank you that the taxpayers of this country received from Moderna for that huge investment: They are thanking the taxpayers of the United States by proposing to quadruple the price of the COVID vaccine."

Sanders' criticisms and entreaties did not appear to move Bancel, who made no concessions and certainly no apologies for the planned price increase. Over the course of the two-hour hearing, Bancel dismissed the role that NIH scientists played in developing the vaccine while emphasizing that the company built up its platform before the pandemic with $3.8 billion in private investments.

When it came to the price Moderna charged the US government per dose, Bancel argued that the US government received a $2.9 billion discount on the vaccine's price.

"We were under no obligation to do so, but, recognizing the US government's investments, our company decided to provide the government with a discount," Bancel said.

While it's unclear what Moderna thought the actual price of the vaccines should have been, the US's "discount" doesn't appear to have been a long-term bargain for the country. While the US paid a little over $26 per dose for the updated boosters, the EU paid $25.50, despite not investing billions in early development and procurement.

“Totally insane”

As for the quadrupling of the US's discount price, Bancel argued that the simple bulk orders for the government were wholly different in nature than the messiness of the commercial market—and that messiness costs extra. During the pandemic, Moderna dealt with one customer (the government) that committed to paying for a set number of doses regardless of whether they made it into arms. And the company delivered those doses to a limited number of federal warehouses. Now, it will have thousands of customers, requiring the company to deal with complex distribution logistics, and to take on the financial risk of manufacturing more doses than are purchased. Moderna will also switch from selling multi-dose vials to single-dose vials, which it sees as more suited for the commercial market. "This is not the same product," Bancel argued, and the quadrupled price reflects that, he suggested.

The committee also needled Bancel about the company's financial assistance programs—which the company boasted would ensure that no American, insured or uninsured, would pay out of pocket for Moderna COVID vaccines going forward. While the company's announcement of this plan generated glowing headlines, the details of how it will work are nonexistent. Bancel acknowledged to the committee that the company has not worked out how the assistance programs will work in practice for uninsured people or how the company will negotiate prices with private insurers and other payers.

"We have no transparency in pricing; it is a totally insane situation," Sanders lamented.

With no ground gained, Sanders turned to one final plea in the hearing:

"The United States—the people in our country—pay the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs in general… will you at least tell us today that the price you are charging for the vaccine will be lower than what other countries around the world are paying? Or are, once again, we going to pay the highest prices?"

Bancel started to respond by noting that health care costs are different in each country before Sanders interrupted and directed him to provide a straight answer, to which Bancel replied: "I cannot say the price will be lower than other countries."

Adblock test (Why?)


Moderna CEO brazenly defends 400% COVID shot price hike, downplays NIH’s role - Ars Technica
Read More

Fed Raises Interest Rates Amid Banking Crisis: Live Updates - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve’s decision on Wednesday on whether to raise rates at a precarious moment carries risks not just for the central bank, but also for President Biden.

Mr. Biden was already relying on the Fed to maintain a delicate balance with its interest rate decisions, simultaneously taming rapid price growth while avoiding plunging the economy into recession. Now, he also needs the Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell, and his colleagues to avert a misstep that could hasten a full-blown financial crisis.

Economists and investors are watching Wednesday’s decision closely, after the Fed and the administration intervened this month to shore up a suddenly shaky regional banking system following the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. So are administration officials, who publicly express support for Mr. Powell but, in some cases, have privately clashed with Fed officials over bank regulation and supervision in the midst of their joint financial rescue efforts.

Forecasters generally expect Fed officials to continue their monthslong march of rate increases, in an effort to cool an inflation rate that is still far too hot for the Fed’s liking. But they expect policymakers to raise rates by only a quarter of a percentage point, to just above 4.75 percent — a smaller move than markets were pricing in before the bank troubles began.

Some economists and former Fed officials have urged Mr. Powell and his colleagues to continue raising rates unabated, in order to project confidence in the system. Others have called on the Fed to pause its efforts, at least temporarily, to avoid dealing further losses to financial institutions holding large amounts of government bonds and other assets that have lost value amid the rapid rate increases of the past year.

“Under the currently unsettled circumstances, the stakes are high,” Hung Tran, a former deputy director of the International Monetary Fund who is now at the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center, wrote in a blog post this week.

“Disappointing market expectations could usher in additional sell-offs in financial markets, especially of bank shares and bonds, possibly requiring more bailouts,” he wrote. “On the other hand, the Fed needs also to communicate its intention to bring inflation back to its target in the medium term — a difficult but not impossible thing to do.”

Economists and investors are watching the Fed’s decision closely.Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

Mr. Biden has for nearly a year professed his belief that the Fed could engineer a so-called soft landing as it raises interest rates, slowing the pace of job creation and bringing down inflation but not pushing the economy into recession. That would complete what the president frequently calls a transition to “steady and more stable growth.”

It would also help Mr. Biden as he gears up for a widely expected announcement that he will seek re-election: History suggests that the president would be buoyed by an economy with low unemployment and historically normal levels of inflation in 2024.

Through the beginning of the year, data suggested a soft landing could be in the works. But in recent months, price growth has picked up again. The economy continues to create jobs at a much faster pace than Mr. Biden said last year would be consistent with more stable growth. Fed officials were eyeing a more aggressive inflation-fighting stance before the banking crisis hit.

Mr. Powell suggested in congressional testimony this month that the Fed could raise rates by as much as half a percentage point in the two-day meeting that ends on Wednesday. Days later, Silicon Valley Bank failed, followed by Signature Bank. The Fed, the Treasury Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced emergency measures to ensure that the banks’ depositors would have access to all their money, and that other regional banks could borrow from the Fed to prevent the rapid flight of deposits that had doomed Silicon Valley Bank.

Mr. Biden will need further cooperation from Fed officials if more bank failures, or other events, threaten a full-scale financial crisis. Republicans control the House and appear unwilling to sign on for a potentially large government rescue of the financial system, like the bipartisan bank bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis.

“It’s especially important when you can’t count on Congress,” said Jason Furman, a Harvard economist who led the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama. “We’re going to see the only game in town when it comes to financial stability is the White House and the Fed.”

Administration officials have publicly lauded Mr. Powell since the Silicon Valley Bank failure. Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, told reporters this week that there was no risk to Mr. Powell’s position as Fed chair from his handling of financial regulation.

“The president has confidence in Jerome Powell,” she said.

Ms. Jean-Pierre also reiterated the administration’s longstanding refusal to comment on Fed interest rate decisions. “They are independent,” she said, adding: “And they are going to make their decision — their monetary policy decision, as it relates to the interest rate, as it relates to dealing with inflation, which are clearly both connected. But I’m just not going to — we’re not going to comment on that from here.”

There is wide debate on what interest rate announcement Mr. Biden should be hoping to hear on Wednesday afternoon.

Some economists and commentators have pushed the Fed to hold off on raising rates entirely, contending that another increase risks further rattling the banking system — and consumers’ confidence in it.

Liberal senators like Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, and progressive groups in Washington have urged the same for months but for a far different reason. They argue that continued rate increases could slam the brakes on economic growth and throw millions of Americans out of work, and they say the real drivers of inflation are corporate profiteering and snarled supply chains, which will not be tamed by higher borrowing costs.

“I don’t think the Fed should be touching interest rate hikes with a 15-foot pole,” said Rakeen Mabud, the chief economist at the Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal policy group in Washington.

“Tanking our labor market is not the way to a healthy economy, is not the way to stable prices,” Ms. Mabud said. “We have an additional imperative this month, which is that aggressive interest rate hikes are exactly what have created some of the instability that we’re seeing” in the financial system.

Other economists, including some Democrats, have urged the Fed to raise rates even more swiftly to beat back inflation as soon as possible.

“The whole reason we have independent central banks is so they think about things on a longer time horizon than the typical White House is able to,” Mr. Furman said. “So I think the Fed, insofar as it did anything to hurt Biden, it was that it raised rates too slowly.”

Adblock test (Why?)


Fed Raises Interest Rates Amid Banking Crisis: Live Updates - The New York Times
Read More

Regional Bank Stocks Fall After New York Community Bancorp Cuts Dividend, Posts Loss - The Wall Street Journal

[unable to retrieve full-text content] Regional Bank Stocks Fall After New York Community Bancorp Cuts Dividend, Posts Loss    The Wall St...