
Istanbul (CNN Business)Turkey's annual rate of inflation has hit a 19-year high as a currency collapse sends the cost of imports soaring.
Turkey's inflation soars to 36%, setting a new record for Erdogan era - CNN
Read More

Istanbul (CNN Business)Turkey's annual rate of inflation has hit a 19-year high as a currency collapse sends the cost of imports soaring.

The electric-car maker managed substantial growth as Europe and China increasingly propelled sales.
Tesla reported Sunday that it delivered 936,000 cars in 2021, an 87 percent increase from the year before, despite the computer chip shortage that has disrupted auto production around the world.
In the fourth quarter alone, the company delivered more than 308,000 vehicles, a 71 percent increase from the quarter a year earlier. The overwhelming share of the deliveries were of the Model 3 sedan and the Model Y hatchback. Wall Street analysts had been expecting deliveries of about 266,000 cars in the fourth quarter, and about 855,000 for the year.
“The numbers are hard to poke holes in,” Daniel Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, wrote in a note to investors. “While there are many competitors in the E.V. space, Tesla continues to dominate market share as evidenced again this quarter.”
Tesla increased sales despite a global shortage of computer chips, which serve as the brains for a variety of electronics, including engine controllers and touch screens. The shortage forced most automakers to idle some plants for weeks at a time and kept them from producing as many vehicles as they had planned.
In July, Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, said his company was overcoming the shortage by switching to types of chips that were more readily available and writing new instructions, or firmware, to be embedded into the chip. Tesla can make such a switch because the components in its cars are designed to be controlled largely by software.
Tesla does not break out its deliveries by country. Much of its recent growth has been propelled by sales in Europe and China.
The jump in deliveries capped a momentous year in which Tesla’s stock price and profits soared. It has also worked to open factories near Austin, Texas, as well as Berlin, in hopes of sustaining its rapid growth.
In October, Tesla’s market value for the first time exceeded $1 trillion, making it more valuable than General Motors, Ford Motor, Toyota, Volkswagen, Stellantis, BMW and several other automakers combined.
On Friday, Tesla’s stock closed at $1,056.78, up from just under $700 at the end of 2020. The stock’s rise was fueled by increasing sales and profits. In the third quarter, the company earned $1.6 billion, more than double its earnings in all of 2020, its first profitable year.
With shares at dizzying heights, Mr. Musk began selling large chunks of his stock, partly to cover taxes, after taking a poll among his followers on Twitter. Several times he said he was done selling but continued.
In total, Mr. Musk sold more than $16 billion worth of Tesla stock. The transactions involved the exercising of 22.8 million options awarded to Mr. Musk as part of his compensation and bonus packages.
Tesla has said it hopes deliveries will increase about 50 percent a year for the next several years, and is counting on output from its Austin and Berlin factories to reach its goal. Both factories are expected to begin producing Model Y hatchbacks soon.
At the same time, Tesla’s product quality has remained uneven. On Thursday, the company told federal regulators that it planned to recall more than 475,000 cars for two separate defects that could affect safety — a misaligned latch on the front hood, which could allow the hood to open unexpectedly, and wiring to the rearview camera that can be damaged by opening and closing the trunk. A day later, vehicles in China were recalled as well.
The pandemic sparked the problem. The highly intricate and interconnected global supply chain is in upheaval. Much of the crisis can be traced to the outbreak of Covid-19, which triggered an economic slowdown, mass layoffs and a halt to production. Here’s what happened next:
A reduction in shipping. With fewer goods being made and fewer people with paychecks to spend at the start of the pandemic, manufacturers and shipping companies assumed that demand would drop sharply. But that proved to be a mistake, as demand for some items would surge.
Demand for protective gear spiked. In early 2020, the entire planet suddenly needed surgical masks and gowns. Most of these goods were made in China. As Chinese factories ramped up production, cargo vessels began delivering gear around the globe.
Then, a shipping container shortage. Shipping containers piled up in many parts of the world after they were emptied. The result was a shortage of containers in the one country that needed them the most: China, where factories would begin pumping out goods in record volumes
Demand for durable goods increased. The pandemic shifted Americans’ spending from eating out and attending events to office furniture, electronics and kitchen appliances – mostly purchased online. The spending was also encouraged by government stimulus programs.
Strained supply chains. Factory goods swiftly overwhelmed U.S. ports. Swelling orders further outstripped the availability of shipping containers, and the cost of shipping a container from Shanghai to Los Angeles skyrocketed tenfold.
Labor shortages. Businesses across the economy, meanwhile, struggled to hire workers, including the truck drivers needed to haul cargo to warehouses. Even as employers resorted to lifting wages, labor shortages persisted, worsening the scarcity of goods.
Component shortages. Shortages of one thing turned into shortages of others. A dearth of computer chips, for example, forced major automakers to slash production, while even delaying the manufacture of medical devices.
A lasting problem. Businesses and consumers reacted to shortages by ordering earlier and extra, especially ahead of the holidays, but that has placed more strain on the system. These issues are a key factor in rising inflation and are likely to last for months — if not longer.
In addition, the company and its Autopilot driver-assistance system have come under closer scrutiny by safety regulators in the United States. Teslas have been involved in a series of crashes with other vehicles, including some that resulted in fatalities, while the Autopilot system was engaged.
The company continues to promote its Autopilot system, which can take over some of the steering, braking and accelerating tasks from drivers, and a more advanced set of features, Full Self Driving, that it offers for $10,000 but has so far allowed only a select group of customers to test.
In August, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a formal investigation into how Autopilot recognizes objects on the road. It is specifically looking into 11 instances when Teslas crashed into emergency vehicles that had stopped on highways and had their lights flashing.
The agency is also looking at more than two dozen other crashes involving Teslas that were under Autopilot control. Eight of those crashes have resulted in a total of 10 deaths since the first occurred in 2016.

In this article
Tesla on Sunday said it delivered 308,600 electric vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2021, beating its previous single-quarter record as well as analysts' expectations. The automaker produced over 305,840 fully electric vehicles total during the same period.
For the full year, Tesla delivered 936,172 vehicles, an 87% increase versus 2020 when it reported its first annual profit on deliveries of 499,647.
In the third quarter of 2021, vehicle deliveries reached 241,300, Tesla's previous best quarter.
According to a consensus compiled by FactSet, Wall Street analysts had anticipated Tesla deliveries of 267,000 in the fourth quarter and 897,000 for all of 2021.
Deliveries are the closest approximation of sales reported by CEO Elon Musk's electric car company.
Tesla combines delivery numbers for its higher-priced Model S and X vehicles, and lower-priced Model 3 and Y vehicles. The company does not break out sales or production numbers by region.
Deliveries of its flagship Model S sedan and Model X falcon wing SUV represented just under 3% of Tesla's total deliveries in 2021. Model 3 and Model Y deliveries amounted to 296,850 in the final quarter of 2021, and 911,208 for the full year.
Tesla makes Model 3 and Model Y vehicles at its factory in Shanghai and in Fremont, California, but only produces the Model X and Y in Fremont.
At Tesla's 2021 annual shareholder meeting, Musk bemoaned a year marked by supply chain problems that made it difficult to obtain enough microchips and other unspecified parts.
Throughout the second year of a global coronavirus pandemic, Tesla was able to increase vehicle deliveries by ramping up production at its first overseas factory in Shanghai, and by making technical changes to the cars that it produces in Fremont, California, so that it could ditch some parts altogether.
Notably, Tesla announced in May that it was removing radar sensors from Model 3 and Model Y vehicles built for customers in North America. Those cars now rely on a camera-based system to enable Tesla's driver assistance features such as traffic-adjusted cruise control or automatic lane-keeping.
Musk has proclaimed that he wants to increase Tesla's vehicle sales volume to 20 million annually over the next nine years. In pursuit of that growth, Tesla is poised to start production of the Model Y crossover at its new factory in Austin, Texas, this year. It aims to open another factory in Brandenburg, Germany, after that.
The company recently moved its headquarters to Texas. The CEO announced the plan in October, and Tesla made it official in early December.
Last month, Musk wrote on Twitter, where he has about 68.4 million followers, "Giga Texas is a $10B+ investment over time, generating at least 20k direct & 100k indirect jobs." According to public filings, Tesla plans to spend $1.6 billion on the Austin, Texas, factory in its first phase now underway.
Despite progress and ambitions in Texas, Tesla has delayed plans to start high-volume production of its Cybertruck, a distinctly angular pickup, until 2023. The company's Semi and revamped Roadster are still in the works, too.
The company now dominates battery electric vehicle sales in the U.S. and much of the world. But it is expected to lose overall market share as competitors bring out fully electric models of their own.
For example, Toyota has told investors it will invest $35 billion to bring 30 battery-electric vehicles out by 2030. Rivian recently began deliveries of its battery-electric pick-up and SUV. And Ford stopped taking reservations for its F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck after receiving 200,000 orders.
Tesla's sales are still expected to rise with overall electric vehicle demand, which is partly driven by climate regulation.
Hoping to slash air pollution from transportation, states including California and New York, are following in the footsteps of several European countries and cities, by setting a date by which they will ban sales of most gas-powered vehicles.
By 2030, about 24% of new vehicles sold worldwide are likely to be fully electric, according to forecasts from Alix Partners.
—CNBC's Jessica Bursztynsky and Jordan Novet contributed reporting.
A Blank Street Coffee location in Brooklyn. Blank Street has received commitments for its third funding round in a year.
Photo: Dave Cole/The Wall Street Journal
Blank Street has a simple business: It sells coffee—sometimes in carts, usually in small stores. It launched its first location 17 months ago, before it began dotting Manhattan and Brooklyn with baristas.
Even a couple of years ago, a rapidly growing chain of no-frills, low-cost coffee shops might have had trouble finding interest from tech investors. But in today’s booming market for early-stage startups, the New York-based company has received commitments for its third funding round in a year. The $35 million investment...
Blank Street has a simple business: It sells coffee—sometimes in carts, usually in small stores. It launched its first location 17 months ago, before it began dotting Manhattan and Brooklyn with baristas.
Even a couple of years ago, a rapidly growing chain of no-frills, low-cost coffee shops might have had trouble finding interest from tech investors. But in today’s booming market for early-stage startups, the New York-based company has received commitments for its third funding round in a year. The $35 million investment comes just three months after the still-fledgling company received $25 million, said Vinay Menda, Blank Street’s chief executive.
“We live in a world where capital is available,” said Mr. Menda, a 29-year-old former venture capitalist who co-founded the coffee company in 2020 with Issam Freiha. Fundraising “was a lot easier than it would have been” in the past, he said.
In the past year, there has been a notable rush of funding into the high-risk category of early-stage startups, as investors have clamored to get into companies even before they had a staff or product. While the startup sector has been deluged with increasing amounts of cash for much of the past decade, most of it has traditionally gone to later-stage private companies that have tested business models.
Investors in 2021 pumped $93 billion into so-called seed-stage and early-stage startups in the U.S. through Dec. 15, a record. That amount compares with $52 billion for all of 2020 and $30 billion in 2016, according to PitchBook Data Inc.
With more money coming in—and the number of new venture-funded startups relatively flat—valuations have surged. The median valuation for the seed- and early-stage companies funded in 2021 was $26 million, up from $16 million in 2020 and $13 million in 2016, according to PitchBook.
Investors betting on the space say they see plenty more room for startups to grow. They are emboldened because many venture firms have been posting their best returns since the dot-com boom, thanks to a flourishing software sector and multibillion-dollar profits on companies like Snowflake Inc. and DoorDash Inc. The combined valuations of private startups globally has swelled into the trillions of dollars—becoming an enormous investment category.
The current rush of capital has caused some prominent investors to raise alarms that the market is overheated. Angst among Silicon Valley insiders about rising startup valuations isn’t new, but the willingness to broadcast those concerns is notable.
Fred Wilson, a partner at Union Square Ventures and early backer of Twitter Inc. and Coinbase Global Inc.,
said in a November blog post he had seen quite a few investment rounds in which companies were valued at $100 million before they had a sustainable business model.“They are being delusional, comforted by the likelihood that someone will come along and pay a higher price in the next round,” he said of the investors. “The numbers just don’t add up.”
Sam Altman, former president of startup incubator Y Combinator—which has backed hits like DoorDash and Airbnb Inc. —predicted in a December tweet that venture capital returns this decade “are going to be much worse than those from the 2010s.”
To compete, many venture capitalists say they have spent less time on background checks and other research before investing. A recent rout of high-growth tech stocks has investors particularly on edge, as startup trends often follow the public markets.
Traditional venture firms have been raising new funds quickly, while hedge funds and private-equity investors have moved into the market. Much of the hedge fund money is aimed at later-stage startups, but the crowded field has pushed other investors to hunt for earlier-stage companies.
Tiger Global, a New York-based hedge fund and startup investor, has taken part in more than 340 startup investment rounds in 2021, up from 78 the previous year, according to PitchBook. A few years ago, the most prolific investors typically made a few dozen such investments.
Among Tiger Global’s investments is Blank Street, which has ambitious growth plans but involves more physical construction than tech investors often like. Mr. Menda, Blank Street’s CEO, says the company’s no-frills approach gives it strong profit margins for its stores, and annualized revenue has quadrupled since it raised money in September.
Mr. Menda said its business model was patterned after a group of Asian businesses, including Indonesia’s Kopi Kenangan and China’s Luckin Coffee Inc., which pioneered a similar approach attracting customers with low-cost drinks and apps that promote deals.
Luckin, by far the most prominent among that group, presents a tricky comparison. The company, which at one point planned to overtake Starbucks Corp. in China, saw its stock price plunge over 95% in 2020 after it told investors that as much as $310 million of its 2019 sales was fabricated by employees. Luckin reached a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over accounting fraud claims, which it neither admitted nor denied.
Venture-capital investors often shun a sector when its best-known company suffers such a fall from grace, but that hasn’t happened with coffee startups. Luckin’s business has persevered—it reported rapid growth in its latest quarter and its stock has recovered some of its losses.
Mr. Menda said Luckin doesn’t make for a good comparison with Blank Street given its management troubles. Instead, the company looks more to numerous other grab-and-go coffee chains that have been able to raise money recently and grow quickly, including Kopi.
Despite allegations of accounting fraud and its settlement with the SEC, Luckin Coffee’s business has persevered.
Photo: Yan Cong for The Wall Street Journal
Multiple rounds of funding at a buzzy company can come just weeks apart today, particularly in areas investors deem hot, like cryptocurrency or corporate credit cards. In more sedate times, venture capitalists often encourage companies to raise every nine to 18 months.
Mark Suster, a partner at Los Angeles-based Upfront Ventures, said the average early-stage company he looked at in the mid-2010s was valued around $15 million, while today it is around $25 million—and the companies often have yet to generate revenue.
To adapt, he makes “quicker bets, earlier,” largely based on the caliber of the founders and initial few hires rather than the quality of the product, he said.
“I used to be able to wait nine months. I could watch how your customers use your product,” he said. Now, “I’m really backing talent, then over time, I will figure out if you can execute.”
Others are turning to more unconventional bets.
In September, startup Colossal Inc. raised more than $16 million for its plan to bring back the woolly mammoth as a species in the wild—by modifying the genomes of the Asian elephant to make the animals look and act like woolly mammoths.
The Jurassic Park-like business plan largely calls for making money off new technology, said Ben Lamm, the company’s CEO. But Colossal also told investors in 2020 there was the potential for “mammoth park attractions,” among other potential revenue sources, according to a slide presentation.
Mr. Lamm said the company only set out to raise $8 million, before finding far more demand than expected.
“It was the right timing,” he said. “People’s mind-sets and visions were in the right spot and right scale.”
Many venture firms have been posting their best returns since the dot-com boom thanks to hits like DoorDash.
Photo: carlo allegri/Reuters
Write to Eliot Brown at eliot.brown@wsj.com

New York (CNN Business)Warren Buffett, the ninth-richest person on the planet, says it's not up to him to settle a strike by 450 steelworkers at a company he owns.
Black Friday in New York’s Midtown Manhattan. Direct aid to consumers helped keep income up in 2021.
Photo: Thalia Juarez for The Wall Street Journal
Nearly two years after the coronavirus pandemic brought much of the U.S. economy to a halt, public companies are recording some of their best ever financial results.
Profit growth is strong. Most companies’ sales are higher than where they were before Covid-19—often well above. The liquidity crunch many feared in 2020 never materialized,...
Nearly two years after the coronavirus pandemic brought much of the U.S. economy to a halt, public companies are recording some of their best ever financial results.
Profit growth is strong. Most companies’ sales are higher than where they were before Covid-19—often well above. The liquidity crunch many feared in 2020 never materialized, leaving companies with sizable cash cushions. The stock market ended 2021 near record highs and far fewer public companies filed for bankruptcy in 2021 than in the years before the pandemic.
“At the start of the pandemic, if you asked us to look forward, I don’t think we would have expected this outcome,” said Brian Kloss, a portfolio manager for Brandywine Global, a unit of Franklin Resources Inc. that manages about $67 billion in assets. “This has been very different than any other cycle we’ve seen.”
Government programs provided funding for businesses, helping them keep workers, while enhanced unemployment benefits and direct aid to consumers also kept income up, said Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial economist at Oxford Economics.
“The support to households was greater than in the past, so that really helped fuel consumer spending,” she said. “That’s what fueled revenue growth and profits.”
The rebound is real for smaller companies, but it is the biggest companies that have fared the best, a Wall Street Journal analysis of corporate financial data shows. For large-capitalization companies in the S&P 500 index, profits and revenue were hurt less by the pandemic’s initial economic slowdown. The biggest companies also rebounded more quickly than smaller ones, even as uncertainty deepened over Covid-19 infection rates and the spread of variants, rising inflation and supply-chain woes.
“The larger firms are able to navigate the supply-chain issues a lot easier,” Ms. Bostjancic said. “They have scale and additional resources that the medium-size to small-size firms are going to find more difficult.”
Companies in the S&P 500 range from clothing retailer Gap Inc., with a market value around $6.6 billion, to Apple Inc., which surged to a nearly $3 trillion market value. The median S&P 400 midcap company has a market value of about $5.7 billion, while the median S&P 600 small cap sports a $1.6 billion valuation, data from S&P Global Market Intelligence shows.
Total sales at all three groups in the most recently reported quarter are up from the comparable period in 2019—and profit growth has been even stronger, data from Refinitiv show.
Apple Inc. has seen its market capitalization surge to nearly $3 trillion.
Photo: Bridget Bennett for The Wall Street Journal
Within those groups, of course, results vary widely. Looking at the past 12 months of reported financials, sales at a third of small-cap companies still trail 2019 levels, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. Midsize and large companies were more likely to have surpassed that benchmark.
Sales at beauty-supply retailer Ulta Beauty Inc. have risen 12% in the 12 months ending this fall over 2019 levels. In 2020, the company had to shut many of its stores for weeks at a time and refocus more intensively on its online operations, Chief Financial Officer Scott Settersten
said.Ulta emphasized self-care products over makeup and expanded augmented-reality features and a program to let customers pick up online orders outside its stores, he said. In-person sales bounced back quickly after its stores reopened in the summer, making up 70% of full-year 2020 sales, and have remained strong. Profit margins have also bounced back, to 10.7% in the 12 months that ended this fall, from 3.6% in the same period in 2020 and 9.7% in 2019, S&P data show.
“The results in 2021 have been extraordinary by any measure,” Mr. Settersten said. “People are coming back to the stores but they’re also continuing to shop digitally.”
2021 was a wild year. With Coronavirus still casting much uncertainty over the future of travel, Rivian and Lucid shaking up the auto industry, and Branson, Bezos and Musk all launching their space tourism programs. But what does 2022 have in store? WSJ’s George Downs takes a look at some of the key events that could be making headlines next year. The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition
Even some companies that have caught up are still feeling the pinch. Brink’s Co. , in S&P’s midcap index, made fewer stops with its iconic armored trucks, recording a 25% drop in revenue as the pandemic led businesses to shut down or scale back in April 2020, said CFO Ron Domanico.
In 2021, sales were recovering in those lines of business, growing about 3% a quarter, until the Delta variant slowed growth to about 1% a quarter this fall, Mr. Domanico said. Revenue has returned to about 96% of its pre-pandemic levels and the company doesn’t expect a full recovery until later in 2022.
How has your company bounced back from the pandemic economy slump? Join the conversation below.
Brink’s has more than made up for the slowdown in its pre-pandemic business with a series of acquisitions since early 2020. But the company’s costs are also rising with inflation and labor shortages.
“Just reading the tea leaves with what we’ve seen about inflation, I expect there will be another round of wage increases,” Mr. Domanico added. “And with our thin margins, we’re going to have to pass that on with price increases.”
Overall, 12-month profit margins are up for public companies since late 2019, even amid rising costs and the subsequent price increases. Here too, bigger companies are doing better.
Large-cap profit margins have long outstripped those of smaller companies. The decline in margins in 2020 was sharper for smaller firms as a group than it was for larger ones. The bigger companies also posted stronger margin growth over the last two years than small-caps.
The pandemic helped some businesses, sometimes in surprising ways. At water-meter maker Badger Meter Inc., a member of the S&P 600 index, revenues initially fell sharply in both its utility and commercial divisions with the onset of the pandemic.
But sales to utilities recovered the next quarter, and grew overall in 2020, offsetting drops in other business lines, said Karen Bauer, Badger’s treasurer and head of investor relations. For 2021, two acquisitions of water-quality monitoring companies helped.
Utility customers accelerated adoption of remote meter monitoring and other automation and digital services, which generate higher margins, increasing the company’s overall profitability, she said.
That helped push net-income margins to 11.5% for the 12 months ended in mid-December 2020, from 10.9% in the same period in 2019. The same dynamic continued in 2021, raising margins to 11.8% despite growing difficulty in securing electronic components and other supplies like packaging materials, the company said.
“We could have delivered more sales if not for the supply chain restraint,” Ms. Bauer said.
Although smaller companies as a group trailed larger ones, Ms. Bauer said Badger’s smaller size proved to be an advantage over the past two years. After spotting problems in its resin supply chain, the company worked quickly to redesign products and raise prices, without multiple layers of decision-making to slow it down.
“Our agility and flexibility as a smaller company helped us see these challenges quicker and react to them perhaps faster than our larger peers,” she said. “You aren’t waiting for a monthly operations meeting.”
Stung by the cash crunch that accompanied the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, many companies rushed to borrow when the pandemic hit in 2020. Large companies were able to borrow large amounts, issuing a median $123.6 million in debt in the 12 months ending in late 2020. The year before, they only issued $6.4 million. In 2021, they started paying it down, cutting debt by $24 million on average, according to data from FactSet.
Midcap companies borrowed in 2020 too, but to a much lesser degree, and they also used the past 12 months to reduce their debt overall. Midcaps increased their borrowing by a median of $1.4 million in 2020, according to debt-issuance data from FactSet, but their median debt load declined by a median $6.2 million in the past year.
The small-caps haven’t increased their debt issuance in the past three years, according to FactSet. Those companies slightly reduced their debt in 2019 and 2020, but cut it by a median $4 million in 2021.
Companies “issued debt to ensure they had enough liquidity to survive for the next three, four, five years without tapping the debt markets if it wasn’t available,” said Mr. Kloss, the portfolio manager for Brandywine.
Companies have started to pay back their debt and spend down their cash—a sign that they believe the worst of the pandemic is behind them, analysts said. Where cash and short-term investments on company balance-sheets spiked during the pandemic, it has begun to decline for large- and midcap companies.
Hertz was among the companies to file for bankruptcy in 2020. It has since emerged from court protection.
Photo: Constanza Hevia H. for The Wall Street Journal
“What’s been encouraging is that we’re seeing a rise in corporate [capital expenditures],” said Christopher Smart, chief global strategist for investment manager Barings. “Companies are not just buying back shares or returning money to shareholders, but they’re using it to reinvest in their business, maybe with M&A.”
Missing from the Journal’s analysis: Companies that didn’t survive the pandemic intact, were acquired or which struggled and fell out of the indexes.
Bankruptcy filings—a measure of the most extreme corporate failure—among small and midsize public companies jumped in 2020, according to data from BankruptcyData, a division of New Generation Research Inc., which tracks bankruptcies by companies with public equity or debt.
There were far fewer such restructurings in 2021, with public companies on track to finish the year with about two-thirds as many bankruptcy filings as they had in 2019.
Among public companies with $100 million to $1 billion in revenue—similar to many companies in the S&P 600 index—there were 38 bankruptcies in 2020, more than double either of the previous two years.
Bankruptcies among companies with $1 billion to $10 billion in revenue—similar to many companies in the S&P 400 index—jumped to 29 in 2020 from just four in 2019.
They included car-rental company Hertz Corp. , fracking pioneer Chesapeake Energy Corp. and luxury retailer Neiman Marcus, which had publicly traded debt. All three companies have since emerged from court protection.
The biggest companies, those with at least $10 billion in annual revenue, have largely avoided bankruptcy court during the pandemic. There were three that filed for chapter 11 in 2020: retailer J.C. Penney Co.—which has since exited Chapter 11 with new owners—and two airlines, Chile’s Latam Airlines Group SA and Grupo Aeromexico SAB.
There was just one in 2021, a Chilean auto importer.
Write to Theo Francis at theo.francis@wsj.com, Thomas Gryta at thomas.gryta@wsj.com and Nina Trentmann at Nina.Trentmann@wsj.com
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/YOGSZ2UHKBODNIE2GAWGZHMXTI.jpg)
The logo of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is seen at the company's news conference in Tokyo, Japan May 9, 2016. REUTERS/Issei Kato
TOKYO, Jan 1 (Reuters) - The Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (7011.T) are set to cooperate with the United States and Bill Gates' venture company to build a high-tech nuclear reactor in Wyoming, the daily Yomiuri reported on Saturday.
The parties will sign an agreement as early as January for JAEA and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to provide technical support and data from Japan's own advanced reactors, the report said citing multiple unidentified sources.
TerraPower, an advanced nuclear power venture founded by Gates, is set to open its Natrium plant in Wyoming in 2028. The U.S. government will provide funding to cover half of the $4 billion project. read more
Terrapower had initially explored the prospect of building an experimental nuclear plant with state-owned China National Nuclear Corp, until it was forced to seek new partners after the administration of Donald Trump restricted nuclear deals with China.
The United States has been competing with China and Russia which also hope to build and export advanced reactors.
Japan, on the other hand, has a bitter history of decommissioning its Monju prototype advanced reactor in 2016, a project which cost $8.5 billion but provided little results and years of controversy.
The Monju facility saw accidents, regulatory breaches, and cover-ups since its conception, and was closed following public distrust of nuclear energy after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Both JAEA and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries could not be reached for comment, as their offices were closed for the New Year holidays.
Reporting by Sakura Murakami; Editing by Kim Coghill
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
[unable to retrieve full-text content] Regional Bank Stocks Fall After New York Community Bancorp Cuts Dividend, Posts Loss The Wall St...